Re: Performance pb vs SQLServer.

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
Cc: dario_d_s(at)unitech(dot)com(dot)ar, scoez(at)harrysoftware(dot)com, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Performance pb vs SQLServer.
Date: 2005-08-15 16:18:59
Message-ID: 20050815161859.GB22386@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 10:25:47AM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:

> SQL 2005 has "MVCC" (they call it something different, of course, but
> that's basicallyi what it is)

Interesting; do they use an overwriting storage manager like Oracle, or
a non-overwriting one like Postgres?

--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]alvh.no-ip.org>)
"The Postgresql hackers have what I call a "NASA space shot" mentality.
Quite refreshing in a world of "weekend drag racer" developers."
(Scott Marlowe)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeremiah Jahn 2005-08-15 16:24:57 I'm configuraing a new system (Bigish) and need some advice.
Previous Message Manfred Koizar 2005-08-15 15:19:44 Re: Odd Locking Problem