From: | Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum <adsmail(at)wars-nicht(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | robert(dot)cleary(at)ul(dot)ie, "Denis Lussier" <denis(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: EnterpriseDB - what happens to pgsql? |
Date: | 2005-08-11 20:35:35 |
Message-ID: | 20050811223535.23e8727b.adsmail@wars-nicht.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 14:41:01 -0400
"Denis Lussier" <denis(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> - The Postgres community is incredibly rich and diverse. It's getting
> ever stronger and momentum is gaining for the worlds most advanced
> open source database. We're proud to be a part of this massive
> collaborative effort that is bigger than any individual, company,
> country, or continent.
PostgreSQL has a good community, we only need to spread the "most
advanced database" part a little bit so that more people will know and
take care. It does not help to have a good product/software, people have
to use it to make it successful.
> - We are trying to provide an increasing amount of functionality that
> helps free Oracle (and other proprietary DB vendors) customers from
> vendor lock-in and exhorbitant pricing. Can this be a bad thing??
Since this is, what PostgreSQL is also doing (increasing functionality):
no, this could not be a bad thing at all.
Kind regards
--
Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum
Failure is not an option. It comes bundled with your Microsoft product.
(Ferenc Mantfeld)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jutta Horstmann | 2005-08-12 09:42:05 | Migration: Informix to PostgreSQL Case Study |
Previous Message | Denis Lussier | 2005-08-11 18:41:01 | Re: EnterpriseDB - what happens to pgsql? |