From: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Race condition in backend process exit |
Date: | 2005-08-11 21:09:17 |
Message-ID: | 20050811210917.GH8489@phlogiston.dyndns.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 03:45:10PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> I'm a bit hesitant to back-patch such a nontrivial and hard-to-test
> change, but it sure looks badly broken to me. Any thoughts about the
> risks involved?
If there were some way to test it reliably, it'd make me feel a lot
better. I guess I'd as soon hear about the risks involved in not
back-patching, because this seems like a pretty dangerous place to be
back-patching (and race condition fixes, in my experience, are often
well-loaded foot-guns, even if I do trust your coding abilities more
than approximately anyone else's).
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
In the future this spectacle of the middle classes shocking the avant-
garde will probably become the textbook definition of Postmodernism.
--Brad Holland
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-08-11 21:13:15 | Re: [HACKERS] Autovacuum loose ends |
Previous Message | Mischa Sandberg | 2005-08-11 21:08:12 | Logging explain-analyze output in pg log? |