Re: Index not being used unless enable_seqscan=false

From: Shane <shane-pgsql(at)cm(dot)nu>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Index not being used unless enable_seqscan=false
Date: 2005-08-11 19:33:24
Message-ID: 20050811193324.GA29970@cm.nu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 12:10:33AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Shane <shane-pgsql(at)cm(dot)nu> writes:
> > I am working with a simple table and query abut cannot seem
> > to get it to use the index I have created.
> > ...
> > explain analyze select msgid from seen where msgtime < cast(now() - interval '6 months' as timestamp(0) without time zone);
>
> As some other people already pointed out, the problem is the horrible
> misestimate of the number of matching rows. You did not say your
> Postgres version, but I'm betting it's pre-8.0. Versions before 8.0
> would not assume that they could get any useful statistical info from
> an expression involving now() (or in general, any non-immutable
> function). The default assumption in such cases is that a lot of
> rows are retrieved --- too many for an indexscan.

Hi Tom,

The version being used is 7.4.7. However, as an
experiment, I ran pg8 on a different port and loaded the
dataset. It needed a vacuum analyze but after that pg8 was
using the index and got the row estimate correct.
Thanks for the pointer,
Shane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Fuhr 2005-08-11 19:37:00 Re: insert performance riddle
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2005-08-11 19:33:16 Re: No PUBLIC access by default?