From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tony Caduto <tony_caduto(at)amsoftwaredesign(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: What's up with EnterpriseDB? |
Date: | 2005-08-11 00:54:33 |
Message-ID: | 20050811005433.GB13973@fetter.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 03:42:59PM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Tony Caduto wrote:
> >I saw their announment today and they said they have Oracle
> >compatiblility.
> >
> >What exactly does this mean? They don't go into any details. Did
> >they implement a Oracle compatible proc language or something?
>
> I don't know the full details but my understanding is they
> implemented things like IN/OUT parameters and a superset of pl/SQL.
I spoke with them today at LWE/SF. They have a subset of PL/SQL (no
packages yet, but they're working on it for A Really Big Client) and
are able to do in-line anonymous PL/SQL blocks. I'm hoping we can
talk them into helping us do in-line anonymous PL/Foo based on what
they've done for this. :)
Cheers,
D
--
David Fetter david(at)fetter(dot)org http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 510 893 6100 mobile: +1 415 235 3778
Remember to vote!
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tony Caduto | 2005-08-11 02:08:56 | EnterpriseDB mentioned in eweek, and... |
Previous Message | Michael Fuhr | 2005-08-11 00:03:34 | Re: insert performance riddle |