Re: What's up with EnterpriseDB?

From: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Tony Caduto <tony_caduto(at)amsoftwaredesign(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: What's up with EnterpriseDB?
Date: 2005-08-11 00:54:33
Message-ID: 20050811005433.GB13973@fetter.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 03:42:59PM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Tony Caduto wrote:
> >I saw their announment today and they said they have Oracle
> >compatiblility.
> >
> >What exactly does this mean? They don't go into any details. Did
> >they implement a Oracle compatible proc language or something?
>
> I don't know the full details but my understanding is they
> implemented things like IN/OUT parameters and a superset of pl/SQL.

I spoke with them today at LWE/SF. They have a subset of PL/SQL (no
packages yet, but they're working on it for A Really Big Client) and
are able to do in-line anonymous PL/SQL blocks. I'm hoping we can
talk them into helping us do in-line anonymous PL/Foo based on what
they've done for this. :)

Cheers,
D
--
David Fetter david(at)fetter(dot)org http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 510 893 6100 mobile: +1 415 235 3778

Remember to vote!

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tony Caduto 2005-08-11 02:08:56 EnterpriseDB mentioned in eweek, and...
Previous Message Michael Fuhr 2005-08-11 00:03:34 Re: insert performance riddle