| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Back from OSCON |
| Date: | 2005-08-09 04:57:18 |
| Message-ID: | 200508090457.j794vIq09011@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Good catch. I forgot that was in there. I have updated it. Thanks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brendan Jurd wrote:
> > I apologize that my server was down Monday/Tuesday, rendering the
> > patches queue unavailable. I also apologize that my secondary MX was
> > misconfigured, causing some email bounces. I think everything is fixed
> > now.
>
>
> Hi Bruce,
>
> I was checking out the patches queue, and there seems to be a mismatch
> between the queue itself, and the documentation of it in the Developer
> FAQ. From said FAQ:
>
> ---
> 1.4) What do I do after choosing an item to work on?
>
> <snip>
>
> A web site is maintained for patches that are ready to be applied,
> http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches, and those that are
> being kept for the next release,
> http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches2.
> ---
>
> For starters, pgpatches2 is a 404.
>
> Also, according to the title at pgpatches, it is a list of patches
> awaiting review, not a list of approved patches awaiting application.
>
> Regards,
>
> BJ
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
>
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeffrey W. Baker | 2005-08-09 05:03:19 | Re: Simplifying wal_sync_method |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-08-09 03:55:03 | Re: Simplifying wal_sync_method |