Re: per user/database connections limit again

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, Petr Jelinek <pjmodos(at)parba(dot)cz>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Subject: Re: per user/database connections limit again
Date: 2005-08-03 12:54:27
Message-ID: 200508031454.29115.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Am Montag, 1. August 2005 16:08 schrieb Bruce Momjian:
> > Would this not work in the context of the general user-specific ALTER
> > USER ... SET something = something?
>
> No because it isn't a GUC variable, it is per-user/db value.

GUC supports per-user/per-db values.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-08-03 14:03:06 Re: per user/database connections limit again
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2005-08-03 09:22:11 Re: Updated instrumentation patch