From: | "Keith Worthington" <keithw(at)narrowpathinc(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | <operationsengineer1(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: boolean or int2 |
Date: | 2005-08-02 18:52:16 |
Message-ID: | 20050802184850.M94644@narrowpathinc.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-novice |
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005 10:31:17 -0700 (PDT), operationsengineer1 wrote
> i have a situation where widgets either pass or fail a
> test and i record the result.
>
> i'm thinking of using boolean to track this - true for
> pass, false for fail.
>
> i've used int2 in other situations b/c i couldn't be
> as sure that only two outcomes were possible. i could
> use int2 here, also (ie, 0 for fail, 1 for pass).
>
> does it make a practical difference which one i use?
>
> as always, thanks for the help. it is much appreciated.
Personally I like to use a boolean to make the code a little more self
documenting. With a column name like passed_test and a boolean your code ends
up looking like
WHERE passed_test
or
WHERE NOT passed_test
Kind Regards,
Keith
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-08-02 20:57:09 | Re: Make year 01/01/0001 but leave timestamp alone |
Previous Message | Jeffrey Melloy | 2005-08-02 18:34:28 | Re: Strange Error on Table Creation Attempt |