From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Remote administration functionality |
Date: | 2005-08-01 00:35:02 |
Message-ID: | 200508010035.j710Z2n17097@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Dave Page wrote:
>
>
>
> -----Original Message----- From: Bruce Momjian
> [mailto:pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us] Sent: Sun 7/31/2005 2:58 PM To: Dave
> Page Cc: Tom Lane; Magnus Hagander; PostgreSQL-development Subject:
> Re: [HACKERS] Remote administration functionality
>
>
> > I was thinking of a global table that can be modified with
> > INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE and is then dumped to a flat file, like we do with
> > pg_shadow.
>
> The problem is, pg_hba.conf might be editted via the OS unlike the text
> version of pg_shadow which is only editted via the server, which would
> make appropriate locking nigh-on impossible afaics.
>
> Unless you're advocating only allowing pg_hba modifications via the
> server, in which case it must be started in default configuration before
> any mods can be made. That doesn't seem like a good idea to me :-(
I am thinking we will need load_pg_hba() and write_pg_hba() that will
load and write the table to pg_hba.conf.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Luke Lonergan | 2005-08-01 01:12:41 | Re: Remote administration functionality |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-08-01 00:33:32 | Re: Remote administration functionality |