| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> | 
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> | 
| Subject: | Re: Updated instrumentation patch | 
| Date: | 2005-07-30 15:58:06 | 
| Message-ID: | 200507301558.j6UFw6922363@candle.pha.pa.us | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches | 
Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > > > I think any secure solution is going to have to block all write 
> > > > access to postgresql.conf, and that includes all the COPY 
> > TO and all 
> > > > the untrusted languages.
> > > 
> > > Exactly. But we won't get that for 8.1. So for now, we 
> > block all write 
> > > access through *new* functions, per the "let's at least not 
> > add more 
> > > security holes" rule.
> > 
> > As far as I know, the only new functionality the patch adds 
> > _over_ copy is the ability to write nulls, and rename/unlink. 
> >  Should we just throw an error when writing null bytes?
> 
> Um. Yes. This patch goes one step further and allows you to block the
> writing of *any* file using these functions. The question is wether that
> one step further is far enough..
I am thinking we can just block null byte writes and say it is the same
as COPY, which we have always used.
-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-07-30 15:58:15 | Re: Updated instrumentation patch | 
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2005-07-30 15:53:08 | Re: Updated instrumentation patch |