| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Jeff Lund <lundtci(at)gmail(dot)com> | 
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org | 
| Subject: | Re: fix pg_autovacuum | 
| Date: | 2005-07-29 22:05:14 | 
| Message-ID: | 20050729220514.GF16537@alvh.no-ip.org | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general | 
On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 03:54:07PM -0500, Jeff Lund wrote:
Hi,
In the future please post to a list instead of asking me privately.  I
have picked a list arbitrarily to post the response.
>   I am a DBA using Postgres 8.0.3, and it is great.  Could someone
> tell me what is wrong or what the problems are with fix pg_autovacuum
> O(n^2) behavior.
The problem is that pg_autovacuum uses a query against the pg_class
system catalog, and has to compare the results with its internal table
list.  This was done using a O(n^2) algorithm.  I'm not sure if a fix
was developed for this problem, but I suspect not.
The integrated autovacuum process that has been developed for 8.1 does
not have this problem because it uses a radically different approach to
obtaining/keeping information.  In fact, each iteration is a new
process, so there's no table list kept in memory.
I might add that I completely rewrote the autovacuum daemon, and I don't
think a single line of the original code is present in the new version.
The ideas, of course, are mostly the same.  (For the time being at least
-- there's no saying where the new code will evolve to.)
-- 
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]alvh.no-ip.org>)
"Las mujeres son como hondas:  mientras más resistencia tienen,
 más lejos puedes llegar con ellas"  (Jonas Nightingale, Leap of Faith)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2005-07-29 23:28:41 | Re: Looking for version 7.4.7 for windows | 
| Previous Message | Phil Endecott | 2005-07-29 21:39:53 | Re: Megabytes of stats saved after every connection |