From: | <operationsengineer1(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | KeithW(at)narrowpathinc(dot)com |
Cc: | Postgresql Mailing list <pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Table Design Issue & PGSQL Performance |
Date: | 2005-07-28 19:07:30 |
Message-ID: | 20050728190730.29535.qmail@web33306.mail.mud.yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-novice |
keith and tom, thanks for the responses. as per a
suggestion i received via email only, i think i will
be best served by creating a t_note_area table and
linking its primary key, note_area_id into the notes
table -> t_notes.note_area_id.
that way i get keith's benefit of full nomenclature
and i also don't have to limit myself by hardcoding
the area names.
i do exactly this for note_contact, but somehow i
wasn't thinking through this situation the way i
should have been.
thanks to everyone for getting me back on the right track.
____________________________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Fuhr | 2005-07-29 02:39:25 | Re: Troubles with PL/Perl in PgSQL |
Previous Message | Keith Worthington | 2005-07-28 18:47:30 | Re: Table Design Issue & PGSQL Performance |