From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Chris Travers <chris(at)travelamericas(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Thomas F(dot) O'Connell" <tfo(at)sitening(dot)com>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Upgrading from 7.1 |
Date: | 2005-07-28 00:27:16 |
Message-ID: | 20050728002716.GU1832@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 05:13:01PM -0700, Chris Travers wrote:
> Thomas F. O'Connell wrote:
>
> >The implicit indexes are no big deal; they're just a sign of indexes
> >getting created by PRIMARY KEYs on your tables.
> >
> >I'm not sure why you're getting errors. Is there a reason you did the
> >schema dump separately from the data dump rather than a monolithic
> >dump/restore?
> >
> I seem to remember encountering an issue some time ago with pg_dump
> dumping tables in an order that prevented them from being reloaded.
This problem is solved in 8.0's pg_dump. Not sure if 7.1 has enough
information in catalogs to make the algorithm run correctly -- I wonder
if pg_depend is needed, because AFAIR there was no pg_depend in 7.1.
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]alvh.no-ip.org>)
"The Gord often wonders why people threaten never to come back after they've
been told never to return" (www.actsofgord.com)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2005-07-28 00:28:10 | Re: transaction timeout |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2005-07-28 00:25:58 | Re: GUID for postgreSQL |