From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Some new list.c primitives |
Date: | 2005-07-28 00:25:32 |
Message-ID: | 20050728002532.GD6635@fetter.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 06:01:21PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Neil (or anyone else with an opinion),
>
> I'm finding several uses in the planner for some new List primitives
> defined as below. I'd like to push these into list.c, but before that,
> has anyone got any serious objections? How about suggestions for better
> names?
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>
>
> /*
> * list_add adds the datum to the list if it's not already a member
> * (membership is determined by equal()).
> */
> static List *
> list_add(List *list, void *datum)
> {
> if (list_member(list, datum))
> return list;
> else
> return lappend(list, datum);
> }
How about list_push for both of these? This opens the door for
possible future functionality like list_pop, list_shift,
list_unshift...
Just my uneducated $.02.
Cheers,
D
--
David Fetter david(at)fetter(dot)org http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 510 893 6100 mobile: +1 415 235 3778
Remember to vote!
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2005-07-28 00:26:26 | Re: ORDER BY <field not in return list> |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2005-07-28 00:22:54 | Autovacuum to-do list |