Re: Postgresql with max_connections=4096

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
To: denis(at)edistar(dot)com
Cc: Jeff Trout <threshar(at)torgo(dot)978(dot)org>, Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Postgresql with max_connections=4096
Date: 2005-07-27 17:53:29
Message-ID: 20050727175329.GX26758@decibel.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 04:46:56PM +0200, denis(at)edistar(dot)com wrote:
> I'm now testing with pg_pool installed on each apache frontend with 260
> pg_pool preforked clients in each machine.
>
> The database seems to work better. At least when it goes to swap it
> doesn't stop working...

Wait, are you saying your database server is swapping? You'll never get
any kind of performance if that's the case.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828

Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2005-07-27 17:55:51 Re: duplicate messages?
Previous Message Roman Neuhauser 2005-07-27 17:51:45 Re: About Tools at the DB design phase.