| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: VACUUM DATABASE |
| Date: | 2005-07-26 20:53:58 |
| Message-ID: | 20050726205358.GA18604@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 09:30:20PM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
>
> I'd like to suggest altering the syntax of VACUUM so that it is possible
> to issue the command VACUUM DATABASE. The keyword DATABASE would be
> optional, to allow backward compatibility.
Huh, so why not have an optional LAZY?
I understand your concern against "VACUUM LAZY table", which is not
helpful -- so your advice would have to be rephrased as "issue a
database-wide lazy vacuum"
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]alvh.no-ip.org>)
"Saca el libro que tu religión considere como el indicado para encontrar la
oración que traiga paz a tu alma. Luego rebootea el computador
y ve si funciona" (Carlos Duclós)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2005-07-26 20:56:11 | Re: [HACKERS] Enticing interns to PostgreSQL |
| Previous Message | Chris Travers | 2005-07-26 20:53:54 | Re: [HACKERS] Enticing interns to PostgreSQL |