Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC

From: Mark Wong <markw(at)osdl(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC
Date: 2005-07-25 18:35:21
Message-ID: 200507251834.j6PIYgjA002334@smtp.osdl.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 19:11:36 -0400
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> BTW, I'd like to look at 302906, but its [Details] link is broken.

Ugh, I tried digging onto the internal systems and it looks like they
were destroyed (or not saved) somehow. It'll have to be rerun.
Sorry...

Mark

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message ohp 2005-07-25 19:12:03 Re: regression failure on latest CVS
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2005-07-25 17:58:17 Re: [PATCHES] Roles - SET ROLE Updated