Re: Imprecision of DAYS_PER_MONTH

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>
Cc: Dann Corbit <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Tino Wildenhain <tino(at)wildenhain(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Imprecision of DAYS_PER_MONTH
Date: 2005-07-22 19:03:13
Message-ID: 200507221903.j6MJ3Dc13936@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 13:47:29 -0700,
> Dann Corbit <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com> wrote:
> > In round figures:
> >
> > Since there are 365.2422 days per tropical year, there are 31556926
> > seconds per year (give or take leap seconds).
> >
> > Ref:
> > http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/K-12/Numbers/Math/Mathematical_Thinking/cale
> > ndar_calculations.htm
>
> According to the current calendar (again ignoring leap seconds) there
> are exactly 365.2425 days per year on average. I think it makes sense to use
> this number when dealing with calendar years and months.

Someone came up with 365.2422. Which is better?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-07-22 19:06:09 Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-07-22 18:06:17 Re: [HACKERS] Planner doesn't look at LIMIT?