Re: Strange input/cast semantics for inet

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: PostgreSQL General Discussion <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Strange input/cast semantics for inet
Date: 2005-07-22 05:14:44
Message-ID: 200507220514.j6M5EiO09595@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Greg Stark wrote:
>
> This looks very strange to me:
>
> staging=> select '1.10'::cidr;
> cidr
> -------------
> 1.10.0.0/16
> (1 row)
>
>
> The normal way to read "1.10" would be as synonymous with "1.0.0.10". This is
> even mandated by the POSIX spec for getaddrinfo and company. q

Interesting. Inet doesn't allow it, but I assume CIDR does because it
is a network and the trailing values are just assumed to be zero. It
looks OK to me as a CIDR.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Fuhr 2005-07-22 05:35:08 Re: Dumb question about count()
Previous Message Benjamin Smith 2005-07-22 05:09:07 Dumb question about count()