From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] Roles - SET ROLE Updated |
Date: | 2005-07-21 21:38:10 |
Message-ID: | 20050721213810.GK24207@ns.snowman.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
* Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
> Yeah, let's take a look. This wouldn't be the first part of the spec
> we've come across that is mostly honored in the breach...
Oracle appears to mostly follow it, except there's an implicit
'SET ROLE all;', at least in the instance I'm looking at. I'm guessing
it's probably something which is tunable. We don't currently have a way
of having certain roles turned on and certain ones turned off for a
given session. That doesn't seem like it'd be a very hard thing to add
though. I have to apologize for not realizing this sooner and
implementing it correctly the first time, sorry about that..
Thanks,
Stephen
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2005-07-21 21:45:14 | Re: [PATCHES] Roles - SET ROLE Updated |
Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2005-07-21 21:24:14 | Re: [PATCHES] Roles - SET ROLE Updated |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2005-07-21 21:45:14 | Re: [PATCHES] Roles - SET ROLE Updated |
Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2005-07-21 21:24:14 | Re: [PATCHES] Roles - SET ROLE Updated |