Re: Buildfarm issues on specific machines

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>, "Pete St(dot) Onge" <pete(at)economics(dot)utoronto(dot)ca>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Buildfarm issues on specific machines
Date: 2005-07-20 17:59:33
Message-ID: 200507201959.33991.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> This is a considerably bigger issue for the buildfarm than it would
> be for ordinary users of our distribution, since in the distro it's
> only the contrib modules that you actually need to run through your
> local flex.

Couldn't we just run the distprep actions (flex, bison) through contrib
as well? That wouldn't hurt anyone, I think.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-07-20 18:10:29 Re: Buildfarm issues on specific machines
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-07-20 17:20:19 Re: Writing Commit Status hint bits (was Re: [HACKERS] Constant WAL replay)