From: | Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Patch to fix plpython on OS X |
Date: | 2005-07-19 20:42:07 |
Message-ID: | 20050719204207.GA27781@winnie.fuhr.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 03:11:35PM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 01:54:00PM -0600, Michael Fuhr wrote:
> > Does this machine have ldd or the equivalent? If so, can you compare
> > "ldd /path/to/python" and "ldd /path/to/plpython.so"?
>
> Oddly, no, it doesn't seem to have ldd. And the buildfarm script seems
> to clean everything up even in the pgsqlkeep directories; or at least I
> couldn't find a plpython.so laying around.
[googles]
"otool -L" appears to be the Darwin equivalent of ldd. If you can
manage to find a plpython.so then it would be interesting to see
which libpython it's linked against.
Can you search the system for all files named libpython* and post
what you find?
--
Michael Fuhr
http://www.fuhr.org/~mfuhr/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2005-07-19 21:13:26 | Re: [HACKERS] Patch to fix plpython on OS X |
Previous Message | Christopher A. Watford | 2005-07-19 20:17:14 | Re: Enticing interns to PostgreSQL |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alon Goldshuv | 2005-07-19 21:05:56 | Re: COPY FROM performance improvements |
Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-07-19 20:11:35 | Re: [HACKERS] Patch to fix plpython on OS X |