| From: | Janning Vygen <vygen(at)gmx(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Changes to not deferred FK in 8.0.3 to 7.4? |
| Date: | 2005-07-18 16:03:15 |
| Message-ID: | 200507181803.15547.vygen@gmx.de |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Am Montag, 18. Juli 2005 16:56 schrieb Tom Lane:
> Janning Vygen <vygen(at)gmx(dot)de> writes:
> > But why doesn't it work if i make alle FK deferrable initially deferred?
>
> You didn't do it right --- I don't believe the code actually looks at
> pg_constraint, it looks at pg_trigger. And if you are going to hack
> pg_trigger directly, be careful to only change the check-trigger rows
> not the action-trigger rows. I forget which is which but Stephen
> probably remembers.
as always: you are absolutly right! I should have checked it properly with the
correct syntax before asking wizards. Sorry for stealing your time. damn. i
felt a little bit like a hacker by manipulating pg_catalog.
regards
Janning
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephan Szabo | 2005-07-18 16:04:13 | Re: Changes to not deferred FK in 8.0.3 to 7.4? |
| Previous Message | Joe Maldonado | 2005-07-18 15:04:28 | Re: TRUNCATE locking problem |