| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Autovacuum name |
| Date: | 2005-07-16 12:17:56 |
| Message-ID: | 200507161217.j6GCHuo18586@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Rod Taylor wrote:
> This may sound silly, but any chance we could change autovacuum_* GUC
> variables to be vacuum_auto_* instead?
>
> This way when you issue a SHOW ALL, all of the vacuum related parameters
> would be in the same place.
Well, the autovacuum items control just autovacuum, while vacuum control
user vacuums as well. I think they are best separate.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rod Taylor | 2005-07-16 14:24:10 | Re: Autovacuum name |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-07-16 11:48:42 | Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC |