Re: 4 pgcrypto regressions failures - 1 unsolved

From: Marko Kreen <marko(at)l-t(dot)ee>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 4 pgcrypto regressions failures - 1 unsolved
Date: 2005-07-12 19:51:58
Message-ID: 20050712195158.GA5394@l-t.ee
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Seems like down mail server ate first mail.

Here it is again.

On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 12:51:44PM +0300, Marko Kreen wrote:
>
> Hopefully the last regression failure.
>
> - openssl.c used EVP_MAX_KEY_LENGTH / EVP_MAX_IV_LENGTH
> constants for buffers, which are small in case of
> OpenSSL 0.9.6x and internal AES. (I tested it with
> 0.9.7 only, so I didn't notice...)
> - Also I noticed that the wrapper macros for CBC mode
> do not update IV buffer.
> - As the previous mistake was not picked up by current
> regression tests, I added a 'longer than a block'
> test to all ciphers.
>
> --
> marko

Attachment Content-Type Size
oldssl.fix.diff text/plain 10.0 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-07-12 20:29:09 Re: 4 pgcrypto regressions failures - 1 unsolved
Previous Message Mark Wong 2005-07-12 19:47:17 dbt2 & opteron performance

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2005-07-12 20:01:56 Re: [PATCHES] Doc patch: New PL/Perl Features
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2005-07-12 19:45:55 Re: PL/Perl list value return causes segfault