From: | Brent Henry <bh_pgperf(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | General DB Tuning |
Date: | 2005-07-12 06:22:47 |
Message-ID: | 20050712062247.37243.qmail@web33902.mail.mud.yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Help! After recently migrating to Postgres 8, I've
discovered to my horror that I can't determine which
queries are poorly performing anymore because the
logging has drastically changed and no longer shows
durations for anything done through JDBC.
So I'm desperately trying to do performance tuning on
my servers and have no way to sort out which
statements are the slowest.
Does anyone have any suggestions? How do you
determine what queries are behaving badly when you
can't get durations out of the logs?
I have a perl script that analyzes the output from
Postgres 7 logs and it works great! But it relies on
the duration being there.
I did some searches on postgresql.org mailing lists
and have seen a few people discussing this problem,
but noone seems to be too worried about it. Is there
a simple work-around?
Sincerely,
Brent
____________________________________________________
Sell on Yahoo! Auctions no fees. Bid on great items.
http://auctions.yahoo.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2005-07-12 07:45:38 | Re: cost-based vacuum |
Previous Message | John A Meinel | 2005-07-12 01:52:25 | Re: Sorting on longer key is faster ? |