From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
Cc: | Postgres Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Must be owner to truncate? |
Date: | 2005-07-08 13:06:53 |
Message-ID: | 20050708130653.GO24207@ns.snowman.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Christopher Kings-Lynne (chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au) wrote:
> I'm strongly in favour of this patch. I am currently in this situation:
>
> 1. Web db user runs as non-superuser, non-owner.
> 2. I have a table of a tens of thousands of rows that I must delete
> entirely and rebuild every day at least (pg_trgm word list)
> 3. It just gets slow over time, even with autovac.
> 4. I can't vacuum it as i'm not the owner, and I cannot truncate it either.
> 5. Table has no triggers or FK's whatsoever.
>
> So, stephen frost's suggestion would be fantastic.
This is a very similar situation to what I'm in, which is why I was
asking for the change. :)
Thanks,
Stephen
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2005-07-08 13:07:41 | Re: Must be owner to truncate? |
Previous Message | Dawid Kuroczko | 2005-07-08 09:41:23 | Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC |