| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Stuart Bishop <stuart(at)stuartbishop(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: Mount database on RAM disk? |
| Date: | 2005-07-08 17:22:01 |
| Message-ID: | 200507081022.01680.josh@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Stuart,
> I'm putting together a road map on how our systems can scale as our load
> increases. As part of this, I need to look into setting up some fast
> read only mirrors of our database. We should have more than enough RAM
> to fit everything into memory. I would like to find out if I could
> expect better performance by mounting the database from a RAM disk, or
> if I would be better off keeping that RAM free and increasing the
> effective_cache_size appropriately.
If you're accessing a dedicated, read-only system with a database small
enough to fit in RAM, it'll all be cached there anyway, at least on Linux
and BSD. You won't be gaining anything by creating a ramdisk.
BTW, effective_cache_size doesn't determine the amount of caching done. It
just informs the planner about how much db is likely to be cached. The
actual caching is up to the OS/filesystem.
--
--Josh
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-07-08 17:48:22 | Re: cost-based vacuum |
| Previous Message | Ian Westmacott | 2005-07-08 16:25:02 | cost-based vacuum |