Re: About unsigned smallint?

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Dawid Kuroczko <qnex42(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Ying Lu <ying_lu(at)cs(dot)concordia(dot)ca>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: About unsigned smallint?
Date: 2005-07-06 21:56:11
Message-ID: 20050706215611.GB11042@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 11:30:52PM +0200, Dawid Kuroczko wrote:

> If you ask here, you'll probably get a good explanation why there
> aren't unsinged types. My guess is that unsigned types add
> complexity which is not really judged by their usefullness, but
> thats only a guess.

Yeah, they are against the SQL standard apparently; and we've got enough
problems with cross-datatype coercion that there's not much interest in
making it worse by adding more types.

--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]alvh.no-ip.org>)
"Some men are heterosexual, and some are bisexual, and some
men don't think about sex at all... they become lawyers" (Woody Allen)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message felix 2005-07-06 22:03:24 Re: 7.3.2 closing connections, sometimes
Previous Message Otto Blomqvist 2005-07-06 21:51:53 Adding miscadmin.h generates errors ?