CURSOR slowes down a WHERE clause 100 times?

From: Niccolo Rigacci <niccolo(at)rigacci(dot)org>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: CURSOR slowes down a WHERE clause 100 times?
Date: 2005-07-06 21:19:46
Message-ID: 20050706211946.GA3460@rigacci.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Hi to all,

I have a performace problem with the following query:

BEGIN;
DECLARE mycursor BINARY CURSOR FOR
SELECT
toponimo,
wpt
FROM wpt_comuni_view
WHERE (
wpt &&
setSRID('BOX3D(4.83 36, 20.16 47.5)'::BOX3D, 4326)
);
FETCH ALL IN mycursor;
END;

I get the results in about 108 seconds (8060 rows).

If I issue the SELECT alone (without the CURSOR) I get the
same results in less than 1 second.

The wpt_comuni_view is a VIEW of a 3 tables JOIN, and the "wpt"
field is a PostGIS geometry column. The "&&" is the PostGIS
"overlaps" operator.

If I CURSOR SELECT from a temp table instead of the JOIN VIEW the
query time 1 second.

If I omit the WHERE clause the CURSOR fetches results in 1
second.

Can the CURSOR on JOIN affects so heavly the WHERE clause? I
suspect that - with the CURSOR - a sequential scan is performed
on the entire data set for each fetched record...

Any idea?

This is the definition of the VIEW:

CREATE VIEW wpt_comuni_view AS
SELECT istat_wpt.oid, istat_wpt.id, istat_wpt.toponimo,
istat_comuni.residenti, istat_wpt.wpt
FROM istat_comuni
JOIN istat_comuni2wpt
USING (idprovincia, idcomune)
JOIN istat_wpt
ON (idwpt = id);

Thank you for any hint.

--
Niccolo Rigacci
Firenze - Italy

War against Iraq? Not in my name!

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John A Meinel 2005-07-06 21:29:00 Re: CURSOR slowes down a WHERE clause 100 times?
Previous Message Michael Fuhr 2005-07-06 20:07:52 Re: ALTER TABLE tabla ALTER COLUMN columna SET STATISTICS number