Re: oids vs composite types, in cvs head

From: Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: andrew(at)supernews(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: oids vs composite types, in cvs head
Date: 2005-07-06 03:28:49
Message-ID: 20050706032849.GA1224@winnie.fuhr.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 09:22:37PM -0600, Michael Fuhr wrote:
>
> It fails for any system column -- weren't there some changes recently
> in how system columns are handled?

...or was that just discussion that never resulted in any changes?
I'm still digging through the archives trying to find what I'm
remembering.

--
Michael Fuhr
http://www.fuhr.org/~mfuhr/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew - Supernews 2005-07-06 03:29:06 Re: oids vs composite types, in cvs head
Previous Message Michael Fuhr 2005-07-06 03:22:37 Re: oids vs composite types, in cvs head