Re: Python setof patch

OK, patch backed out, new and regression file removed.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> Michael Fuhr wrote:
>
> >On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 01:14:25PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Aside from minor problems like being broken and undocumented, there is a
> >>more serious question here: is this even the functionality we want?
> >>
> >>
> >
> >I'd rather see something akin to PL/pgSQL's RETURN NEXT or PL/Perl's
> >return_next.
> >
> >
> >
>
> Agreed. My rudimentary testing shows that plperl's shiny new return_next
> functionality not only avoids memory blowup but has a 40% speed
> improvement over the old 'return the lot at once' API.
>
> cheers
>
> andrew
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073