| From: | Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Marko Kreen <marko(at)l-t(dot)ee>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: contrib/pgcrypto patch for OpenSSL 0.9.8 |
| Date: | 2005-07-04 03:16:50 |
| Message-ID: | 20050704031650.GA60783@winnie.fuhr.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 12:22:03PM +1000, Neil Conway wrote:
>
> Should either or both of these patches be applied to back branches?
Considering that OpenSSL 0.9.8 is supposed to be final "very soon"[1],
probably much sooner than PostgreSQL 8.1, some people will probably
install it and have pgcrypto build problems. Any chance of applying
the patches to at least REL8_0_STABLE?
[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/openssl-announce(at)openssl(dot)org/msg00062.html
--
Michael Fuhr
http://www.fuhr.org/~mfuhr/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-07-04 03:55:51 | HEAD doesn't cope with libraries in non-default locations |
| Previous Message | Nick Johnson | 2005-07-04 02:55:12 | BUG #1749: date_trunc('week', ...) is incorrect for some dates |