Re: Autotools update

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Autotools update
Date: 2005-07-03 05:43:42
Message-ID: 200507030743.44372.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> If it did produce different output, why haven't we noticed it prior
> to this? Has there actually *been* a problem that nobody has
> reported?

Note that we have never used Autoconf 2.59 before, so nobody could have
ever noticed and reported anything. This FreeBSD vs. GNU split doesn't
appear to exist in the ports tree for earlier versions. It might be
worth figuring out how these variants actually differ.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Russell Smith 2005-07-03 06:24:31 Re: contrib/pgcrypto functions not IMMUTABLE?
Previous Message Michael Fuhr 2005-07-03 05:32:36 contrib/pgcrypto functions not IMMUTABLE?