| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)surnet(dot)cl> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Constraint Exclusion (Partitioning) - Initial Review requested |
| Date: | 2005-07-02 22:29:28 |
| Message-ID: | 20050702222928.GB6577@surnet.cl |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Sat, Jul 02, 2005 at 03:56:48PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> >
> > I enclose a fully working implementation of Constraint Exclusion, a very
> > basic form of Partitioning. Initial review is requested, to allow us all
> > to assess what further work is required on this prior to Beta freeze.
> I am surprised no one else has commented on it, which I think means your
> code is ready for the queue. Do you want to adjust it based on this
> feedback or should I apply and you can adjust it later.
I think that the fact that no one commented on it means that nobody has
thoroughly reviewed it. I skimmed over the patch, and it seems OK to me
(save a typo in a comment, it said "OR" and the code said "and" in one
of the truth tables), but my knowledge of the optimizer is not enough
for my comments to have any weight.
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]surnet.cl>)
"Ciencias políticas es la ciencia de entender por qué
los políticos actúan como lo hacen" (netfunny.com)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2005-07-02 22:42:02 | Re: Autotools update |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2005-07-02 22:07:28 | Re: Autotools update |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-07-02 23:05:27 | Re: Constraint Exclusion (Partitioning) - Initial Review requested |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2005-07-02 22:24:46 | Re: per user/database connections limit again |