Re: PostgreSQL Certification

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>, peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Certification
Date: 2005-06-25 03:56:39
Message-ID: 20050625005318.U993@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, 24 Jun 2005, Jim C. Nasby wrote:

> On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 08:42:00AM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
>>>> Am Sonntag, 12. Juni 2005 05:24 schrieb Tatsuo Ishii:
>>>>
>>>>> Thank you for interested in PostgreSQL CE. There is a sample
>>>>> examination problems page:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://osb.sra.co.jp/postgresql-ce/sys/quiz.php?titleid=S74_en
>>>>
>>>> Regarding question 3,
>>>>
>>>> Select one incorrect statement regarding the installation of PostgreSQL.
>>>>
>>>> 1 1. PostgreSQL is unable to use languages other than English unless the
>>>> "--enable-multibyte" option is specified at "./configure" time.
>>>> 2 2. At least 60MB of free disk space is required for compilation.
>>>> 3 3. GNU make is required.
>>>> 4 4. "root" cannot execute "make check" properly.
>>>> 5 5. "--no-locale" should be specified if English is the only language
>>>> to be used in PostgreSQL.
>>>>
>>>> Apparently, the correct answer is 1, but statement 5 is equally false.
>>>
>>>
>>> Really? I vaguley recall that someone who came from US complained
>>> about the sort order of en locale. I thought English speakers prefer C
>>> locale.
>>
>> And if you want to be really picky number 4 is wrong as well:
>>
>> root# su - postgres -c "make check"
>>
>> I know that is really picky but as someone who manages the number of
>> PostgreSQL systems that I do, I might have picked that one. Number 2 is
>> also confusing because am I compiling ALL of PostgreSQL? I just did a
>> check and it took 63 megs just to unpack it, let alone compile it.
>
> This is why I put very little faith in certifications; all that they
> prove is that you know how to pass some test.
>
> Tell me this, does knowing any of the info in this question really make
> you a better PostgreSQL admin or user, other than #1? I would consider
> #2-4 to be trivia, and as others have said #5 is misleading and
> misinformative.

I've been using PostgreSQL since, what, 1995, and, to be totally honest,
I'd probably fail that question without doing some research first :( I'm
one of those that builds via FreeBSD ports, so I don't care about 2 and 3
... and don't generally worry about 1 and 5 since they are auto-set ... I
know 3, since I spent alot of time in the early days developing the
configure side of things, and, well, as someone else pointed out, 4 is a
no brainer ...

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Miles Keaton 2005-06-25 05:44:10 PL/pgSQL function to validate UPC and EAN barcodes - works! Improvements?
Previous Message Christopher Browne 2005-06-25 01:59:42 Re: PostgreSQL Certification