From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca>, Markus Bertheau <twanger(at)bluetwanger(dot)de>, PgSQL - SQL <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: empty view, replace view, column type change? |
Date: | 2005-06-24 04:32:15 |
Message-ID: | 200506240432.j5O4WF026888@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
Tom Lane wrote:
> > If you SELECT 'abc'::varchar(6)::varchar, the end type is varchar(6).
>
> Yeah, this is exactly what's happening --- if you look at gram.y,
> LOCALTIMESTAMP is expanded to "'now'::text::timestamp(6)". I am
> unconvinced that the (6) is a very good idea though. The code says
>
> /* SQL99 mandates a default precision of 6 for timestamp.
> * Also, that is about as precise as we will get since
> * we are using a microsecond time interface.
> * - thomas 2001-12-07
> */
> d->typmod = 6;
>
> but it doesn't seem to me to follow from what the spec says that we need
> to explicitly cast the result of now() to six places. As long as it's
> coming from gettimeofday it can't have more than 6 places anyway, and so
> we might as well save the extra coercion step. (The parser *will* tack
> on a separate coercion function call when presented with this parse
> tree.)
>
> In short, I'm inclined to remove the above-quoted lines, and similarly
> for CURRENT_TIME, CURRENT_TIMESTAMP, and LOCALTIME. Thoughts?
Agreed. That "6" bothered me too when I was cleaning up the timestamp
code a while back.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-06-24 14:32:34 | Re: empty view, replace view, column type change? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-06-23 22:21:22 | Re: empty view, replace view, column type change? |