Re: PL/pgSQL Debugger Support

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)surnet(dot)cl>
To: "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Denis Lussier <denisl(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PL/pgSQL Debugger Support
Date: 2005-06-23 17:54:42
Message-ID: 20050623175442.GA12181@surnet.cl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 01:40:18PM -0400, Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
> >Denis Lussier <denisl(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> >
> >
> >>I got to thinking it'd be kewl if PgAdmin3 supported an interactive
> >>debugger for pl/pgsql.
> >
> >That's been kicked around before, although I don't think anyone wants to
> >tie it to pgAdmin specifically. Check the archives...
>
> I didn't find anything relevant after a quick search, but if memory
> serves, one of the objections to PgAdmin was that it was windows only.
> This of course is no longer true as of PgAdmin III 1.0. It now support
> Win32, Linux and FreeBSD. So perhaps that objection is no longer valid.

I think the point is that we will have to make some modifications to
PL/pgSQL, so why not make sure we write something that any tool can use?
Say, a well-defined BE/FE protocol extension.

--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]surnet.cl>)
"Sallah, I said NO camels! That's FIVE camels; can't you count?"
(Indiana Jones)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2005-06-23 17:55:51 Re: regression failure
Previous Message Matthew T. O'Connor 2005-06-23 17:40:18 Re: PL/pgSQL Debugger Support

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jonah H. Harris 2005-06-23 18:06:53 Re: PL/pgSQL Debugger Support
Previous Message Matthew T. O'Connor 2005-06-23 17:40:18 Re: PL/pgSQL Debugger Support