From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)surnet(dot)cl> |
---|---|
To: | "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Denis Lussier <denisl(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PL/pgSQL Debugger Support |
Date: | 2005-06-23 17:54:42 |
Message-ID: | 20050623175442.GA12181@surnet.cl |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 01:40:18PM -0400, Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
> >Denis Lussier <denisl(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> >
> >
> >>I got to thinking it'd be kewl if PgAdmin3 supported an interactive
> >>debugger for pl/pgsql.
> >
> >That's been kicked around before, although I don't think anyone wants to
> >tie it to pgAdmin specifically. Check the archives...
>
> I didn't find anything relevant after a quick search, but if memory
> serves, one of the objections to PgAdmin was that it was windows only.
> This of course is no longer true as of PgAdmin III 1.0. It now support
> Win32, Linux and FreeBSD. So perhaps that objection is no longer valid.
I think the point is that we will have to make some modifications to
PL/pgSQL, so why not make sure we write something that any tool can use?
Say, a well-defined BE/FE protocol extension.
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]surnet.cl>)
"Sallah, I said NO camels! That's FIVE camels; can't you count?"
(Indiana Jones)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2005-06-23 17:55:51 | Re: regression failure |
Previous Message | Matthew T. O'Connor | 2005-06-23 17:40:18 | Re: PL/pgSQL Debugger Support |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jonah H. Harris | 2005-06-23 18:06:53 | Re: PL/pgSQL Debugger Support |
Previous Message | Matthew T. O'Connor | 2005-06-23 17:40:18 | Re: PL/pgSQL Debugger Support |