From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Gevik babakhani <gevik(at)xs4all(dot)nl> |
Cc: | 'Dave Page' <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, 'Rod Taylor' <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PGDN and Bricolage. |
Date: | 2005-06-22 00:29:27 |
Message-ID: | 20050621212814.O993@ganymede.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005, Gevik babakhani wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Having spent a couple of hours playing with Bricolage and read the docs, I
> find it to be a very powerful backed system for a CMS. However I was
> wondering if we need all this or is there any yet simpler CMS system that
> meets our needs?
IMHO ... just because we may not believe we "need" or "will use" all of
the features today, long term we may find that we use more and more of the
features as we have a better understanding of the overall system ...
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2005-06-22 07:04:03 | Re: PGDN and Bricolage. |
Previous Message | Rod Taylor | 2005-06-21 22:25:14 | Re: PGDN and Bricolage. |