| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Pavel Stehule <stehule(at)kix(dot)fsv(dot)cvut(dot)cz>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, neilc(at)samurai(dot)com, david(at)fetter(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Function's LEAST, GREATEST and DECODE (Oracle vararg |
| Date: | 2005-06-21 20:14:07 |
| Message-ID: | 200506212014.j5LKE7K24978@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Oh, and I personally think DECODE is fine, even if it partly duplicates
> > something we already have. I was just asking to make sure everyone else
> > was OK before I applied it.
>
> I would rather not have a useless variant spelling of CASE ...
> LEAST/GREATEST at least do something that's a bit hard to do otherwise.
OK, I will apply the LEAST/GREATEST parts and see if others can argue
for decode().
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-06-21 20:26:30 | Re: Function's LEAST, GREATEST and DECODE (Oracle vararg |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-06-21 20:06:52 | Space reuse and autovacuum |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-06-21 20:26:30 | Re: Function's LEAST, GREATEST and DECODE (Oracle vararg |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-06-21 19:15:20 | Re: Function's LEAST, GREATEST and DECODE (Oracle vararg |