On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 22:11:25 +1000,
John Hansen <john(at)geeknet(dot)com(dot)au> wrote:
>
> I misunderstood the original post as a request for queries NOT to use
> indexes where it doesn't match the table contents.
I think that is what they were asking, but I don't think they wanted
to see a sequential scan as the alternative.