Re: [PATCHES] default database creation with initdb

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Andreas Pflug" <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] default database creation with initdb
Date: 2005-06-21 13:43:01
Message-ID: 200506210943.02079.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tuesday 21 June 2005 04:01, Dave Page wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Christopher Kings-Lynne [mailto:chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au]
> > Sent: 21 June 2005 08:57
> > To: Dave Page
> > Cc: Robert Treat; Tom Lane; Andrew Dunstan; Andreas Pflug;
> > Magnus Hagander; pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] default database creation with initdb
> >
> > > Yes - that's intentional so that pgAdmin/phpPgAdmin et al. can
> > > reasonably expect it to be there.
> >
> > Problem is, how the hell do I know it's there before I connect?
>
> Well obviously you don't (any more than you know that template1 is
> accessible until you try), but in time it will be on more and more
> systems as people upgrade by when it will make a reasonable default for
> clients.
>
> Alternatively, try to connect to it first, and then fall back to
> template1 (much as libpq negotiates protocol versions with the server).
>

You know, since we don't maintain static connections (http is our friend)
connecting to template1 really isn't a problem for phppgadmin users. At
least I can't remember anyone ever having complained about it.

--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-06-21 13:45:01 Re: Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-06-21 13:42:43 Re: GiST concurrency