From: | Jernej Kos <kostko(at)jweb-network(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: Postgre "idle" process using 100% CPU |
Date: | 2005-06-12 15:53:41 |
Message-ID: | 200506121753.41683.kostko@jweb-network.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Well there should be no complex queries executed (there are some huge tables,
but the queries aren't huge or specially complicated). I tried attaching to
the process via gdb and the process is executing method:
HeapTupleSatisfiesSnapshot()
The backtrace appears to be useless (too many ??s). Is that of any help ?
Regards,
Jernej Kos.
On Thursday 09 of June 2005 17:19, you wrote:
> Jernej Kos <kostko(at)jweb-network(dot)net> writes:
> > i am using postgresql version 8.0.1 on Gentoo Linux and from time to time
> > a postgres process that is marked as idle - "postgres: user db IP(34079)
> > idle" - starts using 100% CPU. There is nothing in the logs, so i don't
> > have a clue what could be the problem.
>
> For a long time? I'd expect it to go busy on receiving a command
> somewhat before changing the PS status, because command parsing
> happens first (else it can't know what to set the status to ...).
> If you are in the habit of sending enormously complex SQL commands
> then maybe this state would last long enough to notice.
>
> If you don't think that's it, maybe you could attach to the busy
> backend with gdb and get a stack trace to find out what it's doing?
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org
--
Jernej Kos <kostko(at)jweb-network(dot)net>
JWeb-Network
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-06-12 16:01:21 | Re: Postgre "idle" process using 100% CPU |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-06-12 15:15:53 | Re: CVS stability |