Re: User Quota Implementation

From: Yann Michel <yann-postgresql(at)spline(dot)de>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: User Quota Implementation
Date: 2005-06-10 16:26:29
Message-ID: 20050610162629.GA25473@zoom.spline.inf.fu-berlin.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 10:59:46AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Well, I have realy a lot of experiences with oracle usage and with its
> > limitation capabilities. What I need the most is space-limitation per
> > tablespace. Since 9i there is also a possibility to restrict cpu-usage
> > for a certain consumer or group but in fact I din't need to to so since
> > most of the apps have their own database. Maybe it could be useful to
> > have these groups later on. As far as I understood the thread above (and
> > any other mails) the space limitation would not only be nice for me.
>
> I assume you can't use file system quotas for the tablespace partitions?

No, that's definetely no solution, due to I'm interested in a general
solution which should be applicable for all platforms.

> > BTW: Is there any patch available, yet? This thread dealt with a "patch"
> > but I didn't see any!?
>
> Oh, there is no patch, just a discussion.

O.K. so I was not wrong about that. Is it usefull to re-discuss some of
the aspects to get a gist of what should probably be
implemented/extended?

Regards,
Yann

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-06-10 16:33:32 Re: User Quota Implementation
Previous Message Teodor Sigaev 2005-06-10 16:24:13 Gist Recovery testing