From: | Yann Michel <yann-postgresql(at)spline(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: User Quota Implementation |
Date: | 2005-06-10 16:26:29 |
Message-ID: | 20050610162629.GA25473@zoom.spline.inf.fu-berlin.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 10:59:46AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Well, I have realy a lot of experiences with oracle usage and with its
> > limitation capabilities. What I need the most is space-limitation per
> > tablespace. Since 9i there is also a possibility to restrict cpu-usage
> > for a certain consumer or group but in fact I din't need to to so since
> > most of the apps have their own database. Maybe it could be useful to
> > have these groups later on. As far as I understood the thread above (and
> > any other mails) the space limitation would not only be nice for me.
>
> I assume you can't use file system quotas for the tablespace partitions?
No, that's definetely no solution, due to I'm interested in a general
solution which should be applicable for all platforms.
> > BTW: Is there any patch available, yet? This thread dealt with a "patch"
> > but I didn't see any!?
>
> Oh, there is no patch, just a discussion.
O.K. so I was not wrong about that. Is it usefull to re-discuss some of
the aspects to get a gist of what should probably be
implemented/extended?
Regards,
Yann
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-06-10 16:33:32 | Re: User Quota Implementation |
Previous Message | Teodor Sigaev | 2005-06-10 16:24:13 | Gist Recovery testing |