From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Yann Michel <yann-postgresql(at)spline(dot)de> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: User Quota Implementation |
Date: | 2005-06-10 14:07:59 |
Message-ID: | 200506101407.j5AE7xn24039@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Yann Michel wrote:
> Hi Bruce,
>
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 09:45:32AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > did anything happen to implementing quotas, yet?
> > > though I did not see anything on the TODO List I was wondering what is
> > > going on.
> >
> > No work has been done on it, and I don't even see a TODO item for it.
>
> Do you think that it is possible that one can generate a TODO item out
> of the request or do you rather think different?
Yes, sure. Ah, I found it. TODO has now:
* Allow limits on per-db/user connections
That is pretty vague, but it is all we have so far. In fact, that
refers more to the number of connections rather than say disk space or
CPU. The issue we have had with these issues in the past is that we
aren't sure how such limits would be implemented or used.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Shelby Cain | 2005-06-10 14:12:28 | Re: CPU-intensive autovacuuming |
Previous Message | Yann Michel | 2005-06-10 14:04:09 | Re: User Quota Implementation |