| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)surnet(dot)cl> |
|---|---|
| To: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Gorodowienko Daniel <daniel(dot)gorodowienko(at)interia(dot)pl>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: So maybe SQLERRM? Sb knows how to check it? |
| Date: | 2005-06-09 04:33:41 |
| Message-ID: | 20050609043341.GA8450@surnet.cl |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 12:25:19PM +1000, Neil Conway wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >No, we don't have SQLERRM support yet. If you were asking about getting
> >the messages from RAISE EXCEPTION, I'm afraid there's no way to get it
> >in the EXCEPTION clause.
> >
> >If you want to contribute it, patches are welcome ...
>
> Actually, Pavel Stehule sent in a patch for this a few days ago, which
> I'll be reviewing and apply to HEAD shortly -- it will be in 8.1.
Huh, I meant a patch for getting the error message from RAISE EXCEPTION.
Does Pavel's patch address that too?
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]surnet.cl>)
"Endurecerse, pero jamás perder la ternura" (E. Guevara)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Neil Conway | 2005-06-09 04:34:15 | Re: So maybe SQLERRM? Sb knows how to check it? |
| Previous Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2005-06-09 02:41:55 | Re: Possible to ignore transactions > n? |