Re: Suggestion: additional system views

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Suggestion: additional system views
Date: 2005-06-07 18:30:50
Message-ID: 200506072030.51008.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Uh, I thought the shoot-down was for duplication of existing
> information in new system tables, not the addition of new system
> table information, e.g. we have pg_operator, but no list of error
> codes or keywords in the system tables.

System tables are primarily useful if (a) the information is variable
for a given installation, or (b) client programs may want to
automatically process the information. Neither seems to apply here.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2005-06-07 18:34:10 Re: libpq API incompatibility between 7.4 and 8.0
Previous Message Mark Wong 2005-06-07 18:20:56 Daily DBT-3 (DSS) Results on CVS head