| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)surnet(dot)cl> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Volkan YAZICI <volkan(dot)yazici(at)gmail(dot)com>, Saquib Farooq Malik <saquibfarooq(at)yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: process hangs when converting sgml documentation to PDF |
| Date: | 2005-06-07 16:39:47 |
| Message-ID: | 20050607163947.GB17902@surnet.cl |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 05:59:19PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Would someone report this to the SGML guys and get them to fix it?
>
> There are no SGML guys anymore. The toolchain is abandoned.
Excellent :-( How about we discuss again whether to move to XML? I
assume there is a newer toolchain for that. I do have issues building
the docs here on a Debian unstable machine (not that i have researched
the problem a lot really.)
AFAIR the problem was that there wasn't a way to include certain parts
of the documentation depending on whether some symbol was defined or
not. Is that still true? Furthermore, do we use that feature and how,
and is there a way to work around the problem?
I think it is the standalone-include and standalone-ignore definitions,
isn't it?
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]surnet.cl>)
Voy a acabar con todos los humanos / con los humanos yo acabaré
voy a acabar con todos / con todos los humanos acabaré (Bender)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2005-06-07 17:57:16 | Re: process hangs when converting sgml documentation to PDF |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-06-07 16:14:56 | Re: process hangs when converting sgml documentation to PDF |