From: | Euler Taveira de Oliveira <eulerto(at)yahoo(dot)com(dot)br> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: uptime function to postmaster |
Date: | 2005-06-07 03:50:03 |
Message-ID: | 20050607035003.85668.qmail@web32710.mail.mud.yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Hi Bruce,
> I think we should return intervals only when we can't return
> meaningful
> timestamp values. I don't have any logic to back up that opinion,
> though.
>
Agreed.
>
> We need to preceed our function names with pg_ for cases like this
> where
> we are supplying pg-specific behavior.
>
Agreed.
An updated version of the patch is attached. It is just implement
'pg_start_time' function that works in multi-user and stand-alone. Docs
is attached too.
Comments?
Euler Taveira de Oliveira
euler[at]yahoo_com_br
__________________________________________________
Converse com seus amigos em tempo real com o Yahoo! Messenger
http://br.download.yahoo.com/messenger/
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
uptime6.diff | application/octet-stream | 5.6 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Neil Conway | 2005-06-07 04:15:07 | Re: lastval() |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-06-07 03:21:32 | Re: Should *.backup files ever be removed from pg_xlog? |