| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)surnet(dot)cl> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alon Goldshuv <agoldshuv(at)greenplum(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Steve Atkins <steve(at)blighty(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: NOLOGGING option, or ? |
| Date: | 2005-06-02 05:17:26 |
| Message-ID: | 20050602051726.GA3694@surnet.cl |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 12:30:01AM -0400, Alon Goldshuv wrote:
> before that, let me just clarify that the performance improvements in
> the patch have nothing to do with the escaping mechanizm. Escapes
> could change. The performance gain in due to a buffered processing
> with minimal line/attribute buffer loads.
May I suggest you present them as separate issues and separate patches?
This way, a patch with the performance improvements is very likely to
get merged; simultaneously we can discuss changes to the escaping
mechanism until everyone agrees (or not) and then produce a patch as
appropiate.
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]surnet.cl>)
Este mail se entrega garantizadamente 100% libre de sarcasmo.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-06-02 06:00:17 | Drop separate CRC32 implementations in ltree, tsearch, tsearch2? |
| Previous Message | Luke Lonergan | 2005-06-02 05:16:34 | Re: NOLOGGING option, or ? |